<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fortune 100 companies failing on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.furlongpr.com/fortune-100-companies-failing-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/fortune-100-companies-failing-on-twitter/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fortune-100-companies-failing-on-twitter</link>
	<description>Furlong PR is a London PR Agency specialising in social media, blogs, SEO &#38; media relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 29% of top US marketers using social media &#124; Furlong PR</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/fortune-100-companies-failing-on-twitter/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>29% of top US marketers using social media &#124; Furlong PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=1543#comment-973</guid>
		<description>[...] findings back up Weber Shandwick&#8217;s research released last week which found that 73% of Fortune 100 companies are not using Twitter, even though they have an average of 5.5 Twitter accounts between [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] findings back up Weber Shandwick&#8217;s research released last week which found that 73% of Fortune 100 companies are not using Twitter, even though they have an average of 5.5 Twitter accounts between [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Z. Elwell</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/fortune-100-companies-failing-on-twitter/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Z. Elwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=1543#comment-972</guid>
		<description>Very few people or companies who get into Twitter realize how much study and work is involved to tweet for &quot;results.&quot; They see the medium in either/or: either it&#039;s for personal chatter...or for selling products or services.

Part of the problem is the extreme amount of time one must &quot;invest&quot; in using twitter to meet specific, targeted goals. The training cycle (which must include study + trial &amp; error) is long - especially when one finally gets into aps.

The only solution is for a company to hire someone full- or part-time to become the face and voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very few people or companies who get into Twitter realize how much study and work is involved to tweet for &#8220;results.&#8221; They see the medium in either/or: either it&#8217;s for personal chatter&#8230;or for selling products or services.</p>
<p>Part of the problem is the extreme amount of time one must &#8220;invest&#8221; in using twitter to meet specific, targeted goals. The training cycle (which must include study + trial &amp; error) is long &#8211; especially when one finally gets into aps.</p>
<p>The only solution is for a company to hire someone full- or part-time to become the face and voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

