<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook users talk to just 4% of their online friends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.furlongpr.com/facebook-users-talk-to-just-4-of-their-online-friends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/facebook-users-talk-to-just-4-of-their-online-friends/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-users-talk-to-just-4-of-their-online-friends</link>
	<description>Furlong PR is a London PR Agency specialising in social media, blogs, SEO &#38; media relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Hogan</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/facebook-users-talk-to-just-4-of-their-online-friends/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Hogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=1366#comment-842</guid>
		<description>@Graham, this is hardly so-called data. Its from a series of studies by Cameron Marlow, a social scientist and researcher at Facebook. He is fortunate to have access to the entire corpus of Facebook data, and can give exceedingly reliable results. It has already been published in the Economist and is available on his website (http://overstated.net).

As for extending and deepening our relationships, this is a debatable claim. I am not suggesting it isolates us - quite the opposite: we live in a world if information overload, where it is challenging to maintain valuable connections with everyone whom we have available to us. I would like you to specify which &#039;all other studies&#039; you refer to. Would this be the work of my co-author danah boyd, or perhaps my colleagues at Michigan State or UIUC who have published on this. I&#039;m more than aware of said work. The thesis is that interfaces do not allow for reliable perception of offline social contexts and groups. This is in keeping with previous work such as boyd&#039;s thesis of collapsed contexts.

Finally, there is no use in debating whether a Facebook friend is a real friend or not. All friends have various qualities. Friends on Facebook signify access to content. Some may be more, but many are not. It is simply a way of being semi-public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Graham, this is hardly so-called data. Its from a series of studies by Cameron Marlow, a social scientist and researcher at Facebook. He is fortunate to have access to the entire corpus of Facebook data, and can give exceedingly reliable results. It has already been published in the Economist and is available on his website (<a href="http://overstated.net" rel="nofollow">http://overstated.net</a>).</p>
<p>As for extending and deepening our relationships, this is a debatable claim. I am not suggesting it isolates us &#8211; quite the opposite: we live in a world if information overload, where it is challenging to maintain valuable connections with everyone whom we have available to us. I would like you to specify which &#8216;all other studies&#8217; you refer to. Would this be the work of my co-author danah boyd, or perhaps my colleagues at Michigan State or UIUC who have published on this. I&#8217;m more than aware of said work. The thesis is that interfaces do not allow for reliable perception of offline social contexts and groups. This is in keeping with previous work such as boyd&#8217;s thesis of collapsed contexts.</p>
<p>Finally, there is no use in debating whether a Facebook friend is a real friend or not. All friends have various qualities. Friends on Facebook signify access to content. Some may be more, but many are not. It is simply a way of being semi-public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSS09 A Success and Presentations on Slideshare LSS&#160;&#124;&#160;Local Social Summit</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/facebook-users-talk-to-just-4-of-their-online-friends/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>LSS09 A Success and Presentations on Slideshare LSS&#160;&#124;&#160;Local Social Summit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=1366#comment-841</guid>
		<description>[...] LSSPosted on November 5, 2009Local Social Summit 09 has been hailed a success by Greg Sterling and Furlong PR amoung others. This is nice to see. During the evening networking reception the general view was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LSSPosted on November 5, 2009Local Social Summit 09 has been hailed a success by Greg Sterling and Furlong PR amoung others. This is nice to see. During the evening networking reception the general view was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Jones - Internet Psychologist</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/facebook-users-talk-to-just-4-of-their-online-friends/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Jones - Internet Psychologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=1366#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Once again so-called data on Facebook serves to confuse. Firstly, sharing with 4% of friends is about the same as what we do in the &quot;real world&quot; anyway. We have close friends and acquaintances, just as people have &quot;real friends&quot; on Facebook and &quot;Facebook friends&quot;. The 4% should not be a surprise but a reassurance that Facebook represents the &quot;normal&quot; world so well.

Secondly, the suggestion that this &quot;limits the development of more meaningful relationships&quot; is actually the reverse of all other research findings to date, which confirm that Facebook and other social networks help us extend and deepen our relationships much further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again so-called data on Facebook serves to confuse. Firstly, sharing with 4% of friends is about the same as what we do in the &#8220;real world&#8221; anyway. We have close friends and acquaintances, just as people have &#8220;real friends&#8221; on Facebook and &#8220;Facebook friends&#8221;. The 4% should not be a surprise but a reassurance that Facebook represents the &#8220;normal&#8221; world so well.</p>
<p>Secondly, the suggestion that this &#8220;limits the development of more meaningful relationships&#8221; is actually the reverse of all other research findings to date, which confirm that Facebook and other social networks help us extend and deepen our relationships much further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

