<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 83% of Twitter accounts inactive in December</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.furlongpr.com/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december</link>
	<description>Furlong PR is a London based Social Media &#38; PR Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Easton</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Easton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=2351#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>Roger - &quot;So these 60 million or so who do not use Twitter after signing up fall into the “just don’t get it” category?&quot;

Or worse. They fall into the &#039;Lets get all sugared up about Twitter for a month, then forget to post&#039; category. Fine for an individual - deadly for a business since it indicates an inability to see through a strategy, lack of foresight (in not allocating resources) and general woolly band wagon jumping.

Sadly, I&#039;ve seen it happen all too often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger &#8211; &#8220;So these 60 million or so who do not use Twitter after signing up fall into the “just don’t get it” category?&#8221;</p>
<p>Or worse. They fall into the &#8216;Lets get all sugared up about Twitter for a month, then forget to post&#8217; category. Fine for an individual &#8211; deadly for a business since it indicates an inability to see through a strategy, lack of foresight (in not allocating resources) and general woolly band wagon jumping.</p>
<p>Sadly, I&#8217;ve seen it happen all too often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Hartmannsgruber</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Hartmannsgruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=2351#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>I recently joined up, and find that it is working wonderfully as a &#039;trend ticker&#039; and a source for links, to websites of interests. That may be the real use of it, more than a personal diary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently joined up, and find that it is working wonderfully as a &#8216;trend ticker&#8217; and a source for links, to websites of interests. That may be the real use of it, more than a personal diary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.furlongpr.com/83-of-twitter-accounts-inactive-in-december/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furlongpr.com/?p=2351#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>So these 60 million or so who do not use Twitter after signing up fall into the &quot;just don&#039;t get it&quot; category? Rather I would say that Twitter itself has done a poor job of articulating the benefits of using Twitter, and evangelists have been talking among themselves rather than reaching a wider audience.

Statistics also show that people who don&#039;t use Twitter and then come back to it tend to have more sticktoitiveness than one-time users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So these 60 million or so who do not use Twitter after signing up fall into the &#8220;just don&#8217;t get it&#8221; category? Rather I would say that Twitter itself has done a poor job of articulating the benefits of using Twitter, and evangelists have been talking among themselves rather than reaching a wider audience.</p>
<p>Statistics also show that people who don&#8217;t use Twitter and then come back to it tend to have more sticktoitiveness than one-time users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

